Tags: , , , | Categories: Generics, Code Development Posted by nurih on 11/29/2009 3:12 PM | Comments (0)

Often enough we have frameworks do heavy lifting for us. That's usually a good thing. But I always found it kind of sedating to let "the man" provide me with too much comfort. Especially when the framework or other SOUP library fails to perform exactly what you want. That usually leads to some grumpiness followed by some code-acrobatics to punch that square peg into a round hole – often negating the elegance and usefulness of the library call altogether.

One task a framework often performs is binding. Binding – as defined here – is taking an object and assigning values to it's properties from a property bag of sorts. For example, a property bag could be a hash-table or list of name-value pairs and an object would be a POCO (Plain old class object). It's common in web and ORM contexts, also in web services to receive a dictionary of values and have to attach them to your domain model. The plain straightforward way would be to pluck key value pairs one by one by name and assign to your object. But that's no fun and error prone. What we would like is to be able to auto-attach values to the target object.

How do we achieve that? Steve Bearman and I actually presented this very briefly as part of a larger talk on advanced C# at SoCal Code Camp last weekend. A bit of reflection, a bit of generics and extensions, and viola:

   1: public static T Populate<T>(this T target, IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object>> values)
   2: {
   3:     Type targetType = target.GetType();
   4:     foreach (var kvp in values)
   5:     {
   6:         PropertyInfo pi = targetType.GetProperty(kvp.Key);
   7:         pi.SetValue(target, kvp.Value, null);
   8:     }
   9:     return target;
  10: }

The extension method Populate() above takes an IEnumerable of KeyValuePair as a parameter. It then iterates a these pairs and for each key finds a property  by that name and assigns the value from the dictionary to the target object. Reflection comes in at lines 6 and 7. A property is found based on the name alone, and assigned to. Usage of this extension can look something like this:

   1: Dictionary<string, object> assignments = new Dictionary<string, object>();
   2: assignments.Add("Name", "Paris Hilton");
   3: assignments.Add("ID", 42);
   4: assignments.Add("HomePhone", "(310)-555-1212");
   5: assignments.Add("WorkPhone", "(310)-777-FILM");
   6: Person paris = new Person();
   7:  
   8: Person result = paris.Populate(assignments);

Simple, granted. Simplistic perhaps. But let's consider that the average programmer doesn't write much code like this. There can be many bells and whistles added here: A property getter might only assign if the prperty is writable, attempt to match without case sensitivity, only match if property is public or adorned with an attribute. The main thinks is that you can write this method into your solution in very few lines and shape it as you wish. You do not have to depend on default MVC binders or ORMs being open source or anything like that to have binding performed. Further utilizing this bit (!) of code you might create a simple object factory that returns a new populated type from any object given a property bag of values. In fact, let's do this right here:

   1: public static class MyFactory<T>
   2: {
   3:     public static T Create(IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object>> values)
   4:     {
   5:         T result;
   6:         ConstructorInfo ctor = typeof(T).GetConstructor(System.Type.EmptyTypes);
   7:         result = (T)ctor.Invoke(null);
   8:         result.Populate(values);
   9:         return result;
  10:     }
  11: }

The generic factory MyFactory has a Create() method which takes a property bag as a parameter and returns a populated instance with the values provided. The usage of the factory eliminates the need for creating a new empty instance before populating it. Well, actually , it does it so you don't have to – code was not eliminated, just consolidated. The usage then becomes:

   1: Dictionary<string, object> values = new Dictionary<string, object>();
   2: values.Add("Name", "Paris Hilton");
   3: values.Add("ID", 42);
   4: values.Add("HomePhone", "(310)-555-1212");
   5: values.Add("WorkPhone", "(310)-777-FILM");
   6:  
   7: Person actual = MyFactory<Person>.Create(values);

So there we have it folks. Another DIY tidbit that would hopefully help you take control of the common binding task away from framework writers and back into your hands - where it belongs.

In production, you would probably want to also take a look at whether there's a Populate() or TryPopulate() -exception or return boolean -  and handle the whole error pathing in an explicit way that fits your own style of coding. Similarly you should consider whether an unassigned property (missing value in the bag) is cause for error and whether extra unmatched values are cause for error. In this example, an extra value will cause an exception and an unassigned property will not.

Happy Binding!

Tags: , , , | Categories: Code Development, General, Generics Posted by nurih on 10/16/2009 9:50 AM | Comments (0)

Sometimes I just write code. And sometimes I clean up my code. Most of the times, I focus on the meat of the methods, hacking away at verbose or lengthy flows, re-factoring out common code, trying to untangle overly complex logic etc.

Recently, I noticed that many of the conditional terms I write span very long lines and are a bit cumbersome to read. The reason for that is that many of the variable names are long, or the properties or both and that often the comparison is on a property of an object or member of a collection etc.

So for instance:

if (summerCatalog.Products[0].ProductCategories[0].ParentCategoryID >= 1 && summerCatalog.Products[0].ProductCategories[0].ParentCategoryID <= 4)
{ 
//...
}


Can become quite long.
Long is not easy to read.
Long is not easy to maintain.
Long is not easy to think through.

What I really wanted to say is if [value] is between [a] and [b].

Of course, one could say "lets just make the variable names shorter". But that flies in the face of self explanatory plain naming. So abbreviating for the sake of short-lineliness (New word! You heard it her first!) is out.

Well, this is just screaming "EXTENSION METHODS" doesn't it?

Here we go then:

/// <summary>
/// Returns whether the value is between the 2 specified boundaries.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="value">The value to compare</param>
/// <param name="minValueInclusive">The min value (inclusive).</param>
/// <param name="maxValueInclusive">The max value (inclusive).</param>
/// <returns>True if the value is equal to or between the boundaries; False otherwise.</returns>
public static bool Between<T>(this T value, T minValueInclusive, T maxValueInclusive) where T : IComparable<T>
{
    if (minValueInclusive.CompareTo(maxValueInclusive) > 0)
    {
        throw new ArgumentException("minimum value must not be greater than maximum value");
    }
    return (value.CompareTo(minValueInclusive) >= 0 && value.CompareTo(maxValueInclusive) <= 0);
}

The Between function takes any object which supports IComparable<T> and performs syntactic sugar comparison with the inclusive min and max values.
What's more, it adds a basic sanity check for the comparison. How many times do I do that sanity check in my normal code (!)?

Now the conditional is

if (summerCatalog.Products[0].ProductCategories[0].ParentCategoryID.Between(1, 4)) 
{
///...
}

At least I don't have to refactor this in my brain while reading.

Sure, you might say, but you could have just de-referenced the deep value and then have a shorter conditional, like so:

Category category = summerCatalog.Products[0].ProductCategories[0];
if (category.ParentCategoryID >= 1 && category.ParentCategoryID <= 4)
{
    //...
}
Yes - of course - but it adds a line of code, places the burden of reading the very common idiom ( x >= a && x <= b) on me, and I constantly stumble on the lest-than-or-equal vs. less-than and it doesn't check for my boundaries being inadvertently swapped.

So there you have it. A simple extension cuts down your lines of code, makes long text shorter and saves lives. Which begs the question: is this already part of the language - and should it be?
Tags: , , , | Categories: Unit Testing, Testing, Code Development Posted by nurih on 8/7/2009 3:12 PM | Comments (0)

It's been years now that unit testing frameworks and tools have grabbed our attention, made their way into our favorite IDE and sparked yet another wave of seemingly endless "my framework is better than yours" wars. And then there are the principal wars of whether TDD is better than Test After Development. And most excitingly the automated testing tools etc. Oh, and let's not forget mocks! So we have all the tools we need – right? Well, kind of, no.

I recently attended a talk by Llewellyn Falco and Woody Zuill the other day, and they used a little library called Approval Tests (http://approvaltests.com/). I immediately fell in love with the concept and the price ($0). Llewellyn is one of the two developers of the product, hosted on http://sourceforge.net/projects/approvaltests/.

What does it do that years of frameworks don't?

For me, a major nuisance is that you have a piece of code, and that piece of code produces a result (object, state – call it what you will). That result is commonly named "actual" in Visual Studio unit tests. The developer must then assert against that result to ensure that the code ran properly. In theory, unit tests are supposed to be small and only test one thing. In reality, functions which return complex objects rarely can be asserted with one assert. You'd typically find yourself asserting several properties or testing some behavior of the actual value. In corporate scenario, the unit tests might morph into some degree of integration tests and objects become more complex, requiring a slew of assert.this and assert.that().

What if you could just run the code, inspect the value returned, and – if it satisfies the requirements – set "that value" to be the comparison for all future runs? Wouldn't that be nice? Good news: Approval Tests does just that. So now, instead of writing so many asserts against your returned value, you just call ApprovalTests.Approve() and the captured state is compared against your current runtime. Neat huh?

But wait, there's more! What if your requirements are regarding a windows form, or a control? how do you write a unit test that asserts against a form? The answer is simple and genius: Capture the form as an image, and compare the image produced by your approved form (after you have carefully compared it to the form given to you by marketing – right?) and compare it to each subsequent run. ApprovalTests simply does a byte by byte comparison of the resultant picture of the form and tells you if it matches what you approved.

Let's break down the steps for installation:

  1. Add a reference to the ApprovalTests.dll assembly.

Yeah,it's that simple.

Ok. Let's break down the steps for adding an approval to your unit test

  1. Write your unit test (arrange, act – no asserts) as usual.
  2. Add a call to Approve()

Yeah, it's that simple.

How do you tell it that the value received is "the right one"? Upon first run, the Approve() call will always fail. Why? Because it has no stored approved value to compare the actual it received against. When it fails, it will print out a message (console or test report – depends on your unit test runner). That message will contain a path for the file that it received, complaining about a lack of approved file. The value captured from that run (and any subsequent run) is stored in a file named something like "{your unit test file path}\{your method}.received.xyz". If you like the result of the run -the image matches what the form should look like, or the text value is what your object should contain etc – then you can rename it to "{your unit test file path}\{your method}.approved.xyz". You should check the approved file into your source control. After all, it's content constitutes the basis of the assertion in your unit test!

Consider the very simple unit test code:

   1: [Test]
   2:         public void DateTime_Constructor_YMDSetDate()
   3:         {
   4:             DateTime actual;
   5:             actual = new DateTime(2038, 4, 1);
   6:             Approvals.Approve(actual.ToString());
   7:         }

The function under test here is the constructor for System.DateTime which takes 3 parameters – month day and year. Upon first run, the test will fail with a message resembling

"TestCase 'MyProject.Tests.DateTimeTest.DateTime_Constructor_YMDSetDate'
failed: ApprovalTests.Core.Exceptions.ApprovalMissingException : Failed Approval: Approval File "C:\….\MyProject\DateTimeTest.DateTime_Constructor_YMDSetDate.approved.txt" Not Found."

That's because this file was never created – it's your first run. Using the standard approver, this file will actually now be created but will be empty. In that same directory you will find a file named {…}.received.txt. This is the capture from this run. You can open the received value file, and inspect the text to ensure that the value returned matches your expected value. If it does, simply rename that file to .approved.text or copy it's content over and run the test again. This time, the Approve() method should succeed. If at any point in the future the method under test returns a different value, the approval will fail. If at any point in the future the specs change, you will need to re-capture a correct behavior and save it.

How do you easily compare the values from the last run and the saved approved value? The approved file is going to be a text file for string approvals, and an image file for WinForm approvals. As it turns out, you can instruct Approval Tests to launch a diff program with the 2 files (received, approved) automatically upon failure, or just open the received file upon failure or silently just fail the unit test. To control that behavior, you use a special attribute

   1: [TestFixture]
   2: [UseReporter(typeof(DiffReporter))]
   3: public class ObjectWriterTest
   4: {

The UserReporterAttribute allows you to specify one of 3 included reporters

  1. DiffReporter – which opens tortoisediff for diffing the received and approved files if the comparison fails.
  2. OpenReceivedFileReporter – which launches the received file using the application registered to it's extension on your system if the comparison fails.
  3. QuietReporter – which does not launch any program but only fails the unit test if the comparison fails.

When your have a CI server and run unit tests as part of your builds, you probably want to use the quiet reporter. For interactive sessions, one of the first 2 will probably be more suitable.

How are value comparisons performed? Under the standard built in methods, a file is written out and compared to byte by byte. If you wish to modify this or any behavior, you can implement your own approver or file writer or reporter by implementing simple interfaces. I ended up adding a general use object writer so that I can approve arbitrary objects. The effort was fairly painless and straightforward.

I did have to read the code to get the concept. If only my time machine worked: I could have read my own blog and saved myself 20 minutes. Yeah, right.

The project has some bells and whistles – plug ins for a few IDE's and there's a version for Java and Ruby. I have not reviewed these versions.

There you have it folks- a shiny new tool under your belt. I can see this saving my hours of mindless typing of Assert.* calls and I can go home early. Yeah, right.

Tags: , , , , , , , , | Categories: Web, Code Development Posted by nurih on 8/5/2009 9:30 AM | Comments (0)

As predicted, I came around to using some radio  buttons. As you might guess by now, I didn't like the HTML or the implementation in the current MVC release. As you may expect, I wrote my own :-)

The implementation is fairly simple and straightforward. It extends System.Web.MVC.ViewPage, takes a list of objects, allows for selection of one of the radio buttons, supports orientation and supports selection of both the value the radio button submits and the display string for that item independently.

   1: using System;
   2: using System.Collections.Generic;
   3: using System.Linq.Expressions;
   4: using System.Web.Mvc;
   5: using System.Web.UI;
   6:  
   7: public static partial class HtmlHelpers
   8: {
   9:     public static void ShowRadioButtonList<T>(this ViewPage page, IList<T> list, string name, Expression<Func<T, object>> valueProperty, Expression<Func<T, object>> displayProperty, System.Web.UI.WebControls.Orientation orientation)
  10:     {
  11:         page.ShowRadioButtonList(list, name, valueProperty, displayProperty, "3", orientation);
  12:     }
  13:  
  14:  
  15:     public static void ShowRadioButtonList<T>(this ViewPage page, IList<T> list, string name, Expression<Func<T, object>> valueProperty, Expression<Func<T, object>> displayProperty, string selectedValue, System.Web.UI.WebControls.Orientation orientation)
  16:     {
  17:         HtmlTextWriter writer = new HtmlTextWriter(page.Response.Output);
  18:         if (writer != null)
  19:         {
  20:             Func<T, object> valueGetter = valueProperty.Compile();
  21:             Func<T, object> displayStringGetter = displayProperty.Compile();
  22:  
  23:             for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
  24:             {
  25:                 T row = list[i];
  26:                 string value = valueGetter(row).ToString();
  27:                 writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Type, "radio");
  28:                 writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Id, name + "_" + i);
  29:                 writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Name, name, true);
  30:                 writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Value, value, true);
  31:                 if (value == selectedValue)
  32:                 {
  33:                     writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Checked,"checked");
  34:                 }
  35:                 writer.RenderBeginTag(HtmlTextWriterTag.Input);
  36:                 writer.Write(displayStringGetter(row));
  37:                 writer.RenderEndTag();
  38:  
  39:                 if (orientation == System.Web.UI.WebControls.Orientation.Vertical)
  40:                 {
  41:                     writer.RenderBeginTag(HtmlTextWriterTag.Br);
  42:                     writer.RenderEndTag();
  43:                 }
  44:             }
  45:         }
  46:     }
  47: }

 

This implementation uses the type Expression<Func<T,Object>> for the selection of the value and the display string. To invoke the helper, assuming you have a list of Product objects, Product being defined:

   1: public class Product
   2: {
   3:     public int ProductID { get; set; }
   4:     public string Title { get; set; }
   5:     public string Description { get; set; }
   6:     public decimal Price { get; set; }
   7: }

You can now call the helper from your MVC View Page strongly typed with a model List<Product>:

   1: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<List<Product>>"
   2:     MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" %>
   3:  

invoked simply

   1: <% this.ShowRadioButtonList<Product>(Model, 
   2:                             "productRadioButtonList", 
   3:                             a => a.ProductID, 
   4:                             d => d.Title, "4", 
   5:                             Orientation.Horizontal); %>

This call will create a radio button for each product in the list (Model is a List<Product> because we strongly typed the page as such). The radio button will use the ProductID property for the value of the input, and the Title property as the displayed string. If one of the product Id's happens to be 4, that radio button will be selected in the group. The radio buttons will all be named "productRadioButtonList" but their ID will be appended an ordinal number  "productRadioButtonList_1","productRadioButtonList_2","productRadioButtonList_3" etc.

There you have it: another day, another MVC control, another blog post.

Tags: , , , , , , , | Categories: Web Posted by nurih on 8/5/2009 4:16 AM | Comments (0)

The need

As certain as the sun rising tomorrow, there will come the point where you will want to display a list or grid with paging. While many solutions exist, and many component developers are coming in with robust solutions, a simple and satisfactory solution can be created fairly easily.

Implementation

Why create a pager from scratch? Several reasons:

1) You want to control the pager completely – display, style and all.

2) You don't like the idea of JavaScript paging, which will load your hundreds of pages to the browser and do client side paging / grid

3) You want to understand and control exactly how a page subset of record is fetched and take control of database or IO thrashing

Of the quickly surveyed solutions out there, I found this one simple and straightforward. Being small, straightforward and simple means also easy to maintain, extend or modify. Based on that solution, I've created my own pager which breaks into 2 class implementations and one usage guidance.

The first class, is the PagedList class. The whole class is rather small and the only crux is doing correct math and ensuring the logic handles zero items returned. This class is responsible for taking a source list of all items (more on that below in the performance considerations) and presenting simple properties for HasNextPage, HasPreviousPage, TotalPages and CurrentPage. The implementation inherits from the generic List<T>, and so exposes and enumerator and the Count property. The constructor copies only the current page's worth of items into the instance though, so Count will return the number of items on the current page (0 to page size) therefore an additional property TotalItems is populated upon construction which exposes the total number of items in the underlying source.

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace BL.Models
{
/// <summary>
/// Adapted from http://blog.wekeroad.com/2007/12/10/aspnet-mvc-pagedlistt/
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of item this list holds</typeparam>
public class PagedList<T> : List<T>, IPagedList
{
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="PagedList&lt;T&gt;"/> class.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="source">The source list of elements containing all elements to be paged over.</param>
/// <param name="currentPage">The current page number (1 based).</param>
/// <param name="pageSize">Size of a page (number of items per page).</param>
public PagedList(IEnumerable<T> source, int currentPage, int itemsPerPage)
{
this.TotalItems = source.Count();
this.ItemsPerPage = itemsPerPage;
this.CurrentPage = Math.Min(Math.Max(1, currentPage), TotalPages);
this.AddRange(source.Skip((this.CurrentPage - 1) * itemsPerPage).Take(itemsPerPage).ToList());
}
public int CurrentPage {get ;private set;}
public int ItemsPerPage { get; private set; }
public bool HasPreviousPage { get { return (CurrentPage > 1); } }
public bool HasNextPage { get { return (CurrentPage * ItemsPerPage) < TotalItems; } }
public int TotalPages { get { return (int)Math.Ceiling((double)TotalItems / ItemsPerPage); } }
public int TotalItems { get; private set; }
}
}

PagedList implements the interface IPagedList, since a static class can not be generic, and the control renderer will need access to the PagedList's properties:

   1: using System;
   2:  
   3: namespace BL.Models
   4: {
   5:     public interface IPagedList
   6:     {
   7:         int CurrentPage { get; }
   8:         bool HasNextPage { get; }
   9:         bool HasPreviousPage { get; }
  10:         int ItemsPerPage { get; }
  11:         int TotalItems { get; }
  12:         int TotalPages { get; }
  13:     }
  14: }

The second class is more like a custom web control. Since this is MVC, we are driven to use a helper like implementation. My approach to developing HTML helpers for MVC is to create an extension method on the System.Web.MVC.ViewPage type. This allows the use of the well known and tested HtmlTextWriter to render the actual HTML rather than creating angled brackets in strings on the fly. I find this approach both more true to the form – rendering output to the output stream and not composing a string to be copied later – and safe: using compliant well tested constants and constructs rather than typing in HTML and hoping your syntax and understanding of the tag is correct.

using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.UI;
public static partial class HtmlHelpers
{
/// <summary>
/// Shows a pager control - Creates a list of links that jump to each page
/// </summary>
/// <param name="page">The ViewPage instance this method executes on.</param>
/// <param name="pagedList">A PagedList instance containing the data for the paged control</param>
/// <param name="controllerName">Name of the controller.</param>
/// <param name="actionName">Name of the action on the controller.</param>
public static void ShowPagerControl(this ViewPage page, IPagedList pagedList, string controllerName, string actionName)
{
HtmlTextWriter writer = new HtmlTextWriter(page.Response.Output);
if (writer != null)
{
for (int pageNum = 1; pageNum <= pagedList.TotalPages; pageNum++)
{
if (pageNum != pagedList.CurrentPage)
{
writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Href, "/" + controllerName + "/" + actionName + "/" + pageNum);
writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Alt, "Page " + pageNum);
writer.RenderBeginTag(HtmlTextWriterTag.A);
}
writer.AddAttribute(HtmlTextWriterAttribute.Class,
pageNum == pagedList.CurrentPage ?
"pageLinkCurrent" :
"pageLink");
writer.RenderBeginTag(HtmlTextWriterTag.Span);
writer.Write(pageNum);
writer.RenderEndTag();
if (pageNum != pagedList.CurrentPage)
{
writer.RenderEndTag();
}
writer.Write("&nbsp;");
}
writer.Write("(");
writer.Write(pagedList.TotalItems);
writer.Write(" items in all)");
}
}
}

 

The implementation creates a list of page numbers, with a link on each except for the current page. The link will be of the format "/{controller name}/{action name}/{page number}".

I have added conditional style attribute to the link so that you can style the current page differently from the other pages easily. Since you have the code, you can extend the resultant HTML as you wish. You might want to have text indication of "no more pages" or some indication if the list is empty etc.

Finally, you would want to make use of this shiny new widget. The steps are as follows

1) In your controller, create an action which takes the page number as it's sole parameter. The action would then create a new instance of the PagedList, passing it the "full list" and the current page number from the parameter.

public ActionResult Page(int id)
        {
            List<Product> products = CatalogService.ListOpenProducts();
            PagedList<Product> data = new PagedList<Product>(products, id, PAGE_SIZE);
 
            return View(data);
        }

2) Change / create a view which takes the PagedList<your row type> as it's model.

<%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" 
Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<BL.Models.PagedList<Product>>" %>

3) Place a call to the extension method to display the pager anywhere in your view (multiple placement allowed – you can put one on top and one on the bottom etc). Recall that the method ShowPagerControl() extends  ViewPage, so the keyword this should show your intellisence for the method. If you chose a more complex model (MVVM ViewModel containing more data than just the paged list) then you would use Model.{paged list property name}. The use of the view as a bag of random data conjured up by string names should IMHO be universally abandoned and eliminated.

<% this.ShowPagerControl(Model, "Bids", "Page"); %>

 

Considerations

Take != load all + scroll

The PagedList implementation takes an IEnumerable<T> as it's source data. Internally, it uses Linq syntax which would seem to require all items be loaded, and then skip the first N pages and take the next {page size} worth of items. If your underlying list of items is a huge DB call, you will find that troubling. What you might consider then will be to use deferred loading. Extend the Linq IQueryable<T> or ObjectQuery<T> and let the ORM of your choice do the paging in the database. If your ORM is eager loader, you will need to implement custom partial record loading and paging at the data source level. If it can defer loading you will be in better shape.

Conversely, you might want to actually eager-load all records at the first shot. This will provide you with 2 benefits: cachability and coherency. Loading all items into memory incurs one DB call overhead and the IO required for all records. If you load each page at a time, you would incur {page count} * page clicks DB call overheads which might exceed the former if users scroll often back and forth. Once you load the whole list, you can cache it in memory and expire it based on data change events. If you have the base list in memory, access to it incurs no more IO regardless of pager clicks. Another phenomena caching gets around is coherency problems. If you page ad the DB level and an item is inserted or deleted, the end user experiences skips or stutter items. A skip is when a user clicks from page 1 to 2 an item which was to be on page 2 now is in the range of page 1 because an item on page 1 was deleted. Going to page 2 skips this item, and paging back should reveal it but would be surprising to the user (because she just came from page 1 and it wasn't there before) creating the appearnace of a skipped / missed item. A stutter is the reverse situation: user clicks from page 1 to 2, and an item from page 1 appears again on page 2. This happens when an item was added and "pushed" the repeat item into page 2 because of it's sorting order. This appears to the user as a malfunction and may infuriate some enough to call customer service (alas, advising customers to adjust their medication does not actually calm them down). A solution to coherence is to cache the result list for each user, expiring the cache actively when navigating away or running a different query.

Conclusion

The code above and variations of it are fairly easy to create. If your favorite web control vendor has not solved this for you, if you want to take full control of your paging of if you are just naturally curious – it's a great way to add paging to your MVC application.

Tags: , , | Categories: Web Posted by nurih on 7/24/2009 11:38 AM | Comments (0)

Seeing that I can use a DataBoundControl such as DataList, and binding it to a source control is achievable – what next?

Data bound controls contain various templates. The usual suspects are the item template and alternating template (for a repeating object, with possible varied style), the header and the footer templates (for enclosing HTML pre/post wrap or header / footer effects).

Under MVC, all events are out the window. So we're not concerned at all with event hookup. We might want to provide the various "modes" of display (Edit, Create, Delete etc) which align well with CRUD command structure and may map to MVC quite naturally. But for starters, my project's requirements simply required styling of the repeating item to be easily controlled.

So rather than inline HTML in the <ItemTemplate> tag, I wanted to use a user control (ASCX). This allows my to style the item once and re-use it in pop-ups or other areas of the site, not just the data list view.

The question becomes then – how do I pass data "down" to the user control? The answer turned out to be to easy – you don't have to do anything! That's right, the containing DataList gets bound to data. The user control then can pluck fields from the "data row" (each item in the bound list of the parent) by using the syntax Eval("{some property}")

So the steps are:

  1. Create your user control (MiniItem.ascx)
  2. Register the user control in the hosting ASPX page
  3. Include the user control in the item template of your data bound control

The user control is an .ascx file, but change it to just inherit from System.Web.UI.UserControl. This is MVC so code behind is left behind..

<%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.UI.UserControl" %>
<fieldset>
    <legend>Oh Goodie!</legend>
    <p>
        Product ID:
        <%#Eval("ProductID") %>
    </p>
    <p>
        Title:
        <%#Eval("Title") %>
    </p>
    <img src='/Content/ProductImages/<%#Eval("ImagePath") %>' alt='Image Path' />
    <p>
        Description:
        <%#Eval("Description") %>
    </p>
</fieldset>

Your host ASPX file will need to register your control type in order to use it, so up at the top you place:

<%@ Register Src="MiniItem.ascx" TagName="MiniItem" TagPrefix="uc1" %>

Now you can use the user control simply by adding it to the ItemTemplate tag:

<asp:DataList runat="server" ID="dataList" RepeatColumns="4" RepeatDirection="Horizontal">
    <ItemTemplate>
        <uc1:MiniItem ID="MiniItem1" runat="server" />
    </ItemTemplate>
</asp:DataList>

There you have it. You can use the good concepts of ASPX and the controls and visual components you are familiar with. While HTML helpers and fluent interface libraries are popping up, some find it more convenient and easy to use the "old" familiar ASPX controls. There are some good reasons to learn new things and try new framework or software paradigms. However, we can also leverage many of the successful declarative features of ASPX as a templating engine to achieve rapid development and modular UI.

Tags: , , , | Categories: Code Development, Web Posted by nurih on 7/7/2009 5:14 AM | Comments (0)

In this article we'll explore the use of classic ASP.NET controls in combination with extension methods in the MVC framework in order to facilitate development while remaining true to the MVC pattern and best practices.

A lot of hype around MVC these days. So, of course, yours truly is working on some project utilizing MVC. While brushing the dust off my raw HTML tag memory and designing the obvious: lists, grids, repeated item displays and the such, I thought "why not use the asp.net controls instead?"

For one, most of the ASP.NET data bound controls have a rich site of event post backs to hook up. MVC says: no dice! You can't rely on the event dispatch loop of asp.net. In fact, this is the whole point of going MVC – to create a simple, well separated delineation between the presentation and the BL. If you have all these states and post back logic pieces all in the code behind you really have a tightly coupled application.

What *is* available though, is the rendering of most controls. So instead of "for each" and "if" statements sprinkled in the "presentation" template, you can actually just use the plain old asp.net controls declaratively. I put "presentation" in quotation marks because the more code (branching is code!) you have in the View, the more brittle it becomes, the more tightly coupled to BL it is and the less testable it is.

The main advantages I find in using the old controls is that:

  1. Familiarity – My developers know them already
  2. Rich – Theming, localization behavior and layout aspects built in and available
  3. Well tested – These controls have been around a while, and are generally well behaved
  4. Modular – The controls isolate the presentation of a particular element and divorce it from the surrounding. In particular, it avoids issues of nesting and other inline logic in the presentation layer.

The main issue to overcome in a DataBoundControl is that with no code behind, how do you specify the data source declaratively? How do you do so with minimum code and maximum flexibility?

One solution is to use a data source object. Yes, they work. In most scenarios you can use them as you did before, but you must note that hooking up events (OnSelecting, OnSelected and the such) would again be challenging to do declaratively.

My approach for my project was to create an extension method for

DataBoundControl has a property "DataSource", to which you assign an object that will be data bound. The most permissive base object System.Object, so we simply create an extension method:

 

using System.Web.UI.WebControls;

public static class DataboundControlExtensions
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Extends <typeparamref name="System.Object"/> to bind it to a <typeparamref name="System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataList"/>
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="data">The data source object to bind.</param>
    /// <param name="control">The control to bind the data source object to.</param>
    public static void BindTo(this object data, DataList control)
    {
        control.DataSource = data;
        control.DataBind();
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Extends <typeparamref name="System.Object"/> to bind it to a <typeparamref name="System.Web.UI.WebControls.ListView"/>
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="data">The data source object to bind.</param>
    /// <param name="control">The control to bind the data source object to.</param>
    public static void BindTo(this object data, ListView control)
    {
        control.DataSource = data;
        control.DataBind();
    }
}

Note that the control is passed in as the target and is strongly typed. As it turns out, you get a runtime error if you attempt to specify the control parameter typed as DataBoundControl – the base class for all data bound controls. In other words, this doesn't work:

public static void BindTo(this object data, DataBoundControl control) // Runtime error!

With the extension included in my project, I can now add the control and  bind it in one code line:

<% Model.BindTo(dataList); %>
<asp:DataList runat="server" ID="dataList" RepeatColumns="2" RepeatDirection="Horizontal">
    <ItemTemplate>
        <fieldset>
            <legend>
                <%# Eval("ID")%></legend>
            <p>
                Title:
                <%#Eval("Title") %>
            </p>
            <a href='<%#Eval("ImagePath") %>'>
                <img src='<%#Eval("ThumbPath") %>'  height="64" width="48" alt="pic"/></a>
            <p>
                Description:
                <%#Eval("Description") %>
            </p>
        </fieldset>
    </ItemTemplate>
</asp:DataList>

This is not as clean as completely declarative binding, but is much cleaner than having loop and branch constructs all over your view.

Most of you would note that the current MVC release includes HTML helpers. The Futures release is promising several more HTML helpers, which would provide with single line calls that would render lists, and other data bound presentation we are accustomed to. The reasons I didn't use the futures HTML helper methods are:

  1. The futures were not in release yet at time
  2. I don't love the mode in which the HTML helpers work
  3. The HTML helpers are not as rich as the asp.net components

The reason I don't love the HTML helpers is simple: they are string valued functions. As string valued functions, they must, internally generate strings and throw away memory. Even when you use StringBuilder, the repetitive appendage of strings creates discarded buffers in the underlying byte array. Asp.Net controls, on the other hand, have access to the underlying output stream via a TextWriter. This means that the appended string snippets do not create intermediary buffers but rather get copied more efficiently to the actual byte stream that would be shipped to the browser.

So if I need to add an HTML helper to MVC what I do is write an extension method that extends System.Web.MVC.ViewPage, like so

using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.UI;

public static class HelloKittyHelper
{
    public static void Meow(this ViewPage page, string text)
    {
        HtmlTextWriter writer = new HtmlTextWriter(page.Response.Output);
        if (writer != null)
        {
            writer.RenderBeginTag(HtmlTextWriterTag.Pre);
            writer.Write(KITTY_ASCII);
            writer.Write(text);
            writer.RenderEndTag();
        }
    }
    /// <summary>
    /// ASCII art of a kitty - source unknown.
    /// </summary>
        private const string KITTY_ASCII = @"
  .-. __ _ .-.
  |  `  / \  |
  /     '.()--\
 |         '._/
_| O   _   O |_
=\    '-'    /=
  '-._____.-'
  /`/\___/\`\
 /\/o     o\/\
(_|         |_)
  |____,____|
  (____|____)
";
}

Then pass it the data from the Model or anything you like from the view:

<%
   1:  this.Meow("purrr.. meow");  
%>

With the ambient objects in the page, I just extend "this", and internally utilize the HtmlTextWriter to write directly to the stream – no intermediary StringBuilder and hopefully less wasted immutable objects. The other advantage is that HtmlTextWriter can do things like begin/end tag tracking, add attributes and encode HTML as necessary. Leveraging existing well tested framework again, reducing costs of testing and education to deliver value early and often.

 

In conclusion, we can use the new MVC concepts and remain true to the separation of view and logic by leveraging existing components and developing minimal custom extensions that help us avoid the pitfalls of "presentation logic".

Tags: , , , , | Posted by nurih on 6/7/2009 12:08 PM | Comments (0)

MVC seems all the rage these days. And while there are many good things it brings to the table, it seams it takes us a step back in terms of I18N.

For instance, if you want to use the special aspx attribute meta:resourceKey="foo", you won't always be able to do so.

The following would work fine:

   1: <asp:Label runat="server" ID="_QueryPrompt" Text="Enter Query" meta:resourcekey="_QueryPrompt" />&nbsp;

But we're out of luck with buttons:

   1: <asp:Button runat="server" ID="btn" Text="Run" meta:resourcekey="_SubmitQuery" />

At runtime, you will get an exception explaining you need a FORM with a runat="Server". Ugh.

 

After some spelunking I came across this discussion, which basically suggests creating an extension to the System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper class. The discussion is thick with issues, specifically that if a UserControl is used, finding it's path in order to get to it's local resource requires all manners of digging around compilation and application with fairly extensive branching and parsing. Ultimately, the extension is complicated by attempting to combine both a resource retrieval, fallback to global from local resource and formatted template substitution in one. A good helper – if the kinks are worked out.

So I wrote my own syntactic sugar to do the same:

   1: public static string Localize(this System.Web.UI.UserControl control, string resourceKey, params object[] args)
   2: {
   3:     string resource = (HttpContext.GetLocalResourceObject(control.AppRelativeVirtualPath, resourceKey) ?? string.Empty).ToString();
   4:     return mergeTokens(resource, args);
   5: }
   6:  
   7: public static string Localize(this System.Web.UI.Page page, string resourceKey, params object[] args)
   8: {
   9:     string resource = (HttpContext.GetLocalResourceObject(page.AppRelativeVirtualPath, resourceKey) ?? string.Empty).ToString();
  10:     return mergeTokens(resource, args);
  11: }
  12:  
  13: private static string mergeTokens(string resource, object[] args)
  14: {
  15:     if (resource != null && args != null && args.Length > 0)
  16:     {
  17:         return string.Format(resource, args);
  18:     }
  19:     else
  20:     {
  21:         return resource;
  22:     }
  23: }

It is substantially shorter and defers to a base class. System.Web.MVC.ViewUserControl inherits from System.Web.UI.UserControl, so the call is true to it's application. I also extend System.Web.UI.Page.

Lastly, there is the issue of a global resource. Since these resources are compiled and accessed at design time using dot notation (MyGlobalRes.MyKey) I felt that providing an extra function would not significantly shorten code or simplify developer's life. That is, given a resx file in the App_GlobalResources containing the file Zones.resx, containing a key Zone1 one would simply write out

   1: <%= Resources.Zones.Zone1 %>

or – if your resource is a template requiring tokens to be merged:

   1: <%= String.Format(Resources.Zones.Zone1,"foo",11) %>

Happy MVC Internationalization, localization and globalization!

Tags: , | Categories: Web, General Posted by nurih on 6/4/2009 10:11 AM | Comments (0)

image

Bing.com as viewed in Google Chrome.

:-)

Tags: , , , , , | Categories: General Posted by nurih on 3/6/2009 1:59 AM | Comments (0)

So I wrote the thing up. Compared with a fairly common alternative, a run of the more type safe and render friendly template took 260 ms to merge 10k iterations vs. 480 ms for the alternative. In addition, the alternative went through almost twice the allocations (meaning more GC would result).

I'm kind of pleased that this is faster than the alternative, but am going to do some more thinking of a better way.  A 46% reduction is nice, but it's just under twice as fast. Still, the benefits of a cached template and token/key checking beats the alternative.

Toying with the idea of a strongly typed template leads to a dead end pretty much. Sure, one could dynamically emit a class that exposes the token names as properties, but then how would you bind to these in compile time? since the tokens are NOT known at compile time, the programmer using the class would have to populate a name value pair in some fashion, so that at run time the binding could be made.

 

//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    public interface IFasterTemplate
    {
        string ID { get; }
        void Render(System.IO.TextWriter writer, IRuntimeValues runtimeValues);
        IRuntimeValues GetRuntimeValuesPrototype();
    }
}
//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    public interface IRuntimeValues
    {
        bool AddValue(string tokenName, string value);
        bool AddValues(IEnumerable values);
        string[] GetAllowedValues();
        IRuntimeValues GetCopy();
        bool IsAlowed(string tokenName);
        string this[string tokenName] { get; }
        string ID { get; }
    }
}
//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    public static class FasterTempateFactory
    {
        public static IFasterTemplate GetFasterTemplate(TokenConfiguration config, ref string template)
        {
            string id = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
            TemplateParts templateParts = processTemplateParts(id, config, ref template);
            IRuntimeValues runtimeValuesPrototype = processTokens(id, templateParts);
            IFasterTemplate result = new FasterTemplate(id, templateParts, runtimeValuesPrototype);
            return result;
        }
        private static IRuntimeValues processTokens(string id, TemplateParts templateParts)
        {
            RuntimeValues result = new RuntimeValues(id);
            for (int i = 0; i < templateParts.Count; i++)
                if (templateParts[i].IsToken)
                    result[templateParts[i].Value] = string.Empty;
            return result;
        }
        private static TemplateParts processTemplateParts(string id, TokenConfiguration config, ref string template)
        {
            TemplateParts result = new TemplateParts();
            char currentChar;
            bool isToken = false;
            StringBuilder sbText = new StringBuilder(template.Length / 2);
            StringBuilder sbToken = new StringBuilder(64);
            for (int idx = 0; idx < template.Length; idx++)
            {
                currentChar = template[idx];
                if (currentChar == config.TokenStartMarker)
                { isToken = true; result.Add(new TemplatePart(sbText.ToString(), false)); sbText.Length = 0; }
                else if (currentChar == config.TokenEndMarker) { isToken = false; result.Add(new TemplatePart(sbToken.ToString(), true)); sbToken.Length = 0; } else { if (isToken)                        sbToken.Append(currentChar); else                        sbText.Append(currentChar); }
            } if (isToken == true) throw new ArgumentException("Template has unclosed token marker"); if (sbText.Length > 0) result.Add(new TemplatePart(sbText.ToString(), false)); return result;
        }
    }
}
//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    internal class FasterTemplate : IFasterTemplate
    {
        private string _ID;
        private TemplateParts _TemplateParts;
        private IRuntimeValues _RuntimeValuesPrototype;
        internal FasterTemplate(string ID, TemplateParts templateParts, IRuntimeValues runtimeValuesPrototype) { _ID = ID; _TemplateParts = templateParts; _RuntimeValuesPrototype = runtimeValuesPrototype; } public IRuntimeValues GetRuntimeValuesPrototype() { return _RuntimeValuesPrototype.GetCopy(); } public string ID { get { return _ID; } }
        public void Render(System.IO.TextWriter writer, IRuntimeValues runtimeValues)
        {
            if (runtimeValues.ID != this._ID) throw new ArgumentException("The runtime values supplied are not compatible with this template! Ensure you got the runtime values object from the template with ID " + this._ID); for (int i = 0, count = _TemplateParts.Count; i < count; i++)
            {
                TemplatePart part = _TemplateParts[i]; if (part.IsToken) { writer.Write(runtimeValues[part.Value]); }
                else
                {
                    writer.Write(part.Value);
                }
            }
        }
    }
}
//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    internal class RuntimeValues : Nuri.FasterTemplate.IRuntimeValues
    {
        private Dictionary<string,string> _AllowedValues;
        internal string _ID;
        internal RuntimeValues(string ID, int capacity)
        {
            _AllowedValues = new Dictionary<string, string>(capacity);
            _ID = ID;
        }
        internal RuntimeValues(string ID) : this(ID, 0x10) { }
        internal Dictionary<string,string> AllowedValues
        {
            get { return _AllowedValues; }
        }
        public string[] GetAllowedValues()
        {
            string[] result = new string[_AllowedValues.Count];
            int i = 0;
            foreach (string key in _AllowedValues.Keys)
            { result[i++] = key; }
            return result;
        }
        public bool IsAlowed(string tokenName)
        {
            return _AllowedValues.ContainsKey(tokenName);
        }
        public bool AddValue(string tokenName, string value)
        {
            if (_AllowedValues.ContainsKey(tokenName))
            {
                _AllowedValues[tokenName] = value;
                return true;
            }
            else
                return false;
        }

        public bool AddValues(IEnumerable values)
        {
            bool result = true;
            foreach (KeyValuePair<string, string> pair in values)
            {
                result = result && this.AddValue(pair.Key, pair.Value);
            }
            return result;
        }
        public string this[string tokenName]
        {
            get
            {
                return _AllowedValues[tokenName];
            }
            internal set
            { _AllowedValues[tokenName] = value; }
        }
        public IRuntimeValues GetCopy()
        {
            RuntimeValues result = new RuntimeValues(this._ID, _AllowedValues.Count);
            foreach (string key in _AllowedValues.Keys)
                result.AllowedValues[key] = string.Empty;

            return result;
        }
        public string ID
        {
            get { return _ID; }
        }
    }
}
//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    internal struct TemplatePart
    {
        public bool IsToken;
        public string Value;
        public TemplatePart(string value, bool isToken)
        {
            this.Value = value;
            this.IsToken = isToken;
        }
    }
}
//------------------------------------
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    class TemplateParts : List<TemplatePart> { }
}
//------------------------------------ 
namespace Nuri.FasterTemplate
{
    public struct TokenConfiguration
    {
        public readonly char TokenStartMarker;
        public readonly char TokenEndMarker;
        public TokenConfiguration(char tokenStartMarker, char tokenEndMarker)
        {
            TokenStartMarker = tokenStartMarker;
            TokenEndMarker = tokenEndMarker;
        }
    }
}